data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4307d/4307db09e9fd2c11816d81e99ef82b3a9f6e839d" alt="Sigma full frame lenses for sony e mount"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d11/99d11d75507d69128b4b451c7e78e0edc9e5b51e" alt="sigma full frame lenses for sony e mount sigma full frame lenses for sony e mount"
Matthew Gore | Light And Matter For orientation, this is the full from of the shots being compared below as 100% crops.Īt the other end of the zoom, at the Tamron was occasionally more contrasty, creating a sharper appearance to the image overall, but resolution differences were negligible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9044b/9044b47cbef319dca2e75fa36ec98d1e02c62871" alt="sigma full frame lenses for sony e mount sigma full frame lenses for sony e mount"
The difference was admittedly a minor one, in most cases, but visible outside of laboratory conditions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29fb2/29fb2c9d7ecd50abdd3ae5c9083563945dab6ccd" alt="sigma full frame lenses for sony e mount sigma full frame lenses for sony e mount"
Matthew Gore | Light And Matter Resolution and SharpnessĪfter reviewing the Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 OS ART for Canon mount, I didn’t have particularly high hopes for the new Sigma 24-70 model for mirrorless, so I was pleasantly surprised to discover how well the new lens performed.Īt the wide end of the zoom (tested at 28mm), the Sigma produced noticeably better resolution than the Tamron across the frame, from center to corner. 1 By backing up, you’re adding more foreground into the image, and what used to be foreground in the image before backing up will seem smaller in comparison to the subject or mid-ground after backing up. Backing up and taking the photo from a further distance may be a workaround in some circumstances (when the subject is close enough to you that backing up will make a difference), but even then, you’ll be changing the distance relationships between the foreground, background, and subjects in the photo.
#Sigma full frame lenses for sony e mount manual
Matthew Gore | Light And MatterĪt the same time, the Tamron uses the 67mm filter threads like all of the f/2.8 zoom lenses in their lineup, while the Sigma utilizes the same massive 82mm filter threads as the Sony GM.Īs much as I have enjoyed using the Tamron lens over the past couple of years, its minimalist design means that it has no manual switches or buttons, while the Sigma lens has an MF/AF switch and an AF lock button, along with a zoom lock switch. While the Sigma lens is physically shorter and lighter than the Sony 24-70 f/2.8 GM (5.35″ long, 1.95lbs), it is still substantially larger than the Tamron 28-75 the Sigma weighs 1.84 pounds compared the the Tamron’s 1.21, about 65% as much as the Sigma.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4307d/4307db09e9fd2c11816d81e99ef82b3a9f6e839d" alt="Sigma full frame lenses for sony e mount"